🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's race for the White House, the former president wooed the electorate with pledges to lower costs immediately upon taking office. But, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay minimal attention to affordability issues. All that changed after price-fatigued voters expressed dissatisfaction at the ballot box. Within days, his team initiated a hastily assembled effort to tackle living costs. Unfortunately, the drive is a hot mess—filled with illogical claims, contradictions, magical thinking, blame-shifting, and misleading statements.

Detached Claims and Grocery Store Truth

Just two days after the election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Food prices are way down. All items is way down… So I don’t want to hear about affordability.” These words from billionaire Trump—often mingles with other ultra-rich individuals—demonstrated utter contempt for millions of Americans who struggle every time they go the grocery store. In effect, he dismissed their concerns as unimportant, implying they had it wrong about price levels.

This statement that everything was “way down” was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could all costs be decreasing when the taxes he imposed were pushing up costs? Recent data show the cost of bananas increased 6.9% in the last twelve months, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee surged by nearly 19%—partly due to import taxes on Brazil’s coffee and beef. Between January and September, prices rose in five of the six food categories tracked by the Consumer Price Index, including animal proteins (rising over 4%), non-alcoholic beverages (increasing nearly 3%), and produce (rising slightly).

Inconsistencies and Inaccuracies in Economic Claims

Despite these numbers, the president continues to push his misleading narrative about lower costs. Since election day, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” insisted “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “it is far less expensive under Trump than it was under sleepy Joe Biden.” These statements contradict the reality that general costs have clearly increased after the previous administration. Currently, inflation is running at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, Trump boasted that gas prices had dropped to nearly $2 a gallon, even though official data show they are $3.19.

Faced with reality and lower approval ratings, some Trump aides evidently cautioned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. Many citizens are frustrated about prices continuing to climb after assurances of decreases. In response, aides proposed one quick fix: reduce certain import taxes. This sensible idea clashed with the president’s unrealistic claim that additional taxes would not increase costs for American shoppers.

Proposed Solutions and Their Potential Impact

As certain taxes reduced on several food items, the administration will likely claim that he has cut prices once those foods start declining in price. This would be similar to a firestarter boasting for extinguishing a blaze that he had started. On another occasion, when addressing fast-food leaders, Trump stated that “we are in the peak period of America” and assured the audience that “costs are decreasing and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a wealthy individual to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—especially when millions risk losing food stamps or rising insurance costs.

According to a recent poll from October, three-quarters of respondents think the state of the economy are fair or poor, while just a quarter rate them positive. Another poll showed that a majority of citizens feel the administration’s actions have “worsened economic conditions” in the country.

Financial Truth and Proposed Measures

The treasury secretary, Trump’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a golden age. He noted that instead of thriving, certain sectors of the US economy “are in recession.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—appears to have contracted for multiple consecutive months and shed approximately tens of thousands of positions since January. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the central bank to cut interest rates—an action that could help affordability.

Reacting to public dismay about living costs, the president proposed a direct payment of “a dividend of at least $2,000 a person” not for “high income people.” To numerous struggling Americans, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that lawmakers—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will enact such a plan. The scheme could raise government expenditure, increase interest rates, and possibly fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy.

A further proposed solution for affordability centered on introducing half-century home loans, with the notion that this would reduce monthly mortgage payments. However, reality is that such lengthy loans would do little to lower monthly payments—frequently cutting them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these mortgages could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and slow their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Previous Administration and Economic Prospects

In their cost-cutting effort, Trump and his team have again pointed fingers at the previous president for financial challenges, including increasing costs. Spokespeople stated they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “cleaning up the prior administration’s price hikes.” These are unfounded and untruthful claims. Actually, the former president left a robust economic situation, with inflation way down, economic growth strong, and unemployment low. But, Trump’s policies—particularly his tariffs—have resulted in an economic mess, pushing up prices and reducing economic output.

According to an economist, chief economist at a research firm, 22 states are already in recession, with their economies damaged by the administration’s trade policies. He worries that if large states such as major economies tumble into recession, the US could face a widespread recession. In downturns, people typically have less money to spend, and inflation usually declines. Unfortunately, with the highly-touted cost initiative likely to do little to control costs, his primary method for achieving increased affordability might prove to be pushing the nation into recession—something that hard-pressed households really can’t afford.